3. Discuss three theories that purport to explain why members of Congress vote as they do. Chapter 11: Congress. Wilson Textbook.

There argon at least three ways which egest a representative or a senator to ballot for or against a bill or amendment: realistic, organizational and attitudinal. figural is found on the hypothesis that members fate to get re-elected and in that respectfore take to please their constituents. Organizational is establish on the boldness that since to the highest degree constituents dont know how their senator voted, it is not essential to please them. provided it is master(prenominal) to please fellow members of social intercourse. The attitudinal is based on the assumption that there are so many conflicting pressures on members of Congress that they cancel one an opposite out, leaving them virtually justify to vote on the basis of their have got beliefs. The representational understand has merit under special circumstances, like when the constituents feed a clear view on some income tax return and a legislators vote on that issue will vex much than attent ion. For instance, a legislator from a highly black dominion wont vote against a civil rights bill for minorities, while representatives with broadly speaking non-minority (white) voters in their district can vote whichever way they please on the issue. Foreign policy is generally remote from the nonchalant pursual of close Americans and the earthly concern changes trusts on it rather rapidly. The constituents and the legislator vote other than for the most part on foreign policy. When an issue arouses friendly passion among voters, it is necessary for the legislator to go in accordance with the jural age constituents, despite his or her personal convictions if he or she wants to be re-elected. The general problem with representational explanation is that public opinion is not strong and clear on most measures on which the Congress votes.

Many representatives and senators face constituencies that are divided on key issues. The organizational view deals more with legislators balloting in accordance to cues... The shory essay comes with a good introduction, which tells us three main reasons how the representatives vote. The elaboration is clear, too. but if more examples are included, and have explained which of the three theories is more important, or much more based on by senators, it would be better. also, I want to push a question: How would they senators vote if the will of the large number contradicts the senators own moral judgement? If you want to get a integral essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper