Law of Property Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Law of Property - try out ExampleThough there were by- rectitudes which goerned the use of land, constant disputes amongst the neighboring communities and individuals emerged. Therefore, there was a need for the laws to be set to regulate the use of land and property in every community (Locke, chap V). The laws correct the existence of the property differ from one state to a nonher. It is argued that the existence of the property on a snatch of land gives one an opportunity to use the land upon which the property is. However, there are the rights of property that, in effect, prohibit or restrict people in using other peoples property. some countries surrender adopted these laws. The laws issue legal provisions with regard to land ownership. That is to affirm that only instantaneously involved individuals or close relatives can own a certain piece of land (MacPheron 1987). The law in this context must dictate that private property has to be considered a social and policy-making amenity by virtue of its existence on the land (Blomley 2005). There are critical situations where the governance has to concern itself with increment of sports taking part fully in the community as in the casing of Horne Dale. This is with the view of making the economy of the country better through proper utilization of the set. The effort of the governing to achieve this could be hindered by a number of factors. These include high prices set by the seller, non-compliant neighbors and the previous occupants of the land. Owing to this, analytical measures to curb this crisis economically will be discussed in detail. Rules that governs the ownership of the property in community minimizes the quarrels between the neighboring individuals. The political sympathies mandate is to serve members of a community by adjust property issues. However, the use of the playing fields that are to be put up by the government should have limits to the members for effective service to all membe rs. According to the law, the four charitable companies have ownership over the land by the law of justice which has been set by the state (Ackerman 1977). The high prices the companies may have set for the government could be due to the compensation of the taxes they have been paying for the same piece of land. In this regard, Nozick (1974) argued that the levies paid by an individual or social club are a form of political belligerence hurled up on them by the government. The companies in their high expectations of high prices from the government could also have been as a result of them thinking they own the piece of land. Contrary to this, Kohler and Clarke (2005) argued that any facility initiated by the government is owned by the government and is a non-profit making property. However, in the event of the government making its fiscal budget for the year, it may be forced to collect funds from the services provided in the field to squeeze the financial constrains. Therefore, t he state must diversify a number of activities and make maximum use of the facility by creating more opportunities to involve many participants. In the Insolvency Act 1986, s. 335, it is made clear that if a company is declared bankrupt, the court proceedings will take their course whereby the law of property will apply. In such a situation, the government may apply the law and convert such companies that are not contributing to the economy of the state into a social amenity. It has to be taken into