Individual Reflective Report On Gibbs Cycle Of Reflection Education Essay

Individual Reflective Report On Gibbs cause pass Of Reflection Education EssayThe Gibbs cycle of reflection is utilise in 2 incidences in the say. The outset sequent is the theme project for CLS air on stiffen and second is the feedback given for the SIM degree for the line of products report. In both of the incidences, problems argon evaluated and necessary solutions are adoptn for the improvements. The solutions are proceeding planed to make it achievable and measureable with in a specific time period. chance ONE THE STARCH POSTER SESSION1.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE disasterThe misadventure happened during the amylum calling card session on the week 3 of commercialization of life sciences session. We were assigned a multitude project to commercialize the starch of a company. We were supposed to prepare a post horse drawing the route for commercialization.The starch had several magnificences resembling uplifted in fibre and fall the obesity rate. The nib was prepar ed showing the treads of obesity and how the starch get out help the people fork out a healthy lifestyle. The market for the starch was collected from varies websites like euro monitor. The product advantage of the resistant starch was shown to that of enemy Company. The road for commercialization of product was drawn. The menu was presented in the class. The same gear up to fail was do by former(a) multitudes.1.2 FEELING OF THE INCIDENT (ON THE power abbreviation)What I matte?I felt that the none was not beloved in the visual representation make up in the first place it was presented. There were lot of gaps in the poster, the combinations of colours were not good and the content was not to the level of get the hang. During presentation, I managed the circumscribe to give a good meaning withal I feared there was not enough data in the poster and I dont get by the answer if I was interrogative mooded. Luckily, there were not so many an opposite(prenominal) quest ions. The only question asked was about how to create value in this poster which I managed to answer.What my root word members felt?My congregation members felt that the poster was not as good as they expected. The visual content was felt truly unretentive. No group member felt that there effort was shown in the poster. But e trulyone in the group accepted that the presentation by me was easily done even though we had poor contents in hand.What did an otherwise(prenominal) group members feel?The other group members felt that the poster was good and well presented. Indeed it was better than the other groups. The other groups didnt proceed to take the starch to the market. They stopped at the point of analysing the importance of starch. The poster of other groups wasnt complete according to assigned work.What did the head for the hills teacher feel?The poster was appreciated by the production line instructor for showing the market and how it rout out be commercialized. The lineage instructor felt improvements can be make in the poster especially in visual representation.1.3 EVALUATION OF THE INCIDENTAlthough it was a group activity only 2 of the group members did the poster with minor contribution from others. The group did not well co-ordinate for the project. some members of the group taught it was evidently unnecessary waste of time. Many group members felt that this was not the group they intended to be in and some of their marchs like not contributing to group activities demonstrated their disinterest in co-ordinating with the group. The poor visual effects and content were due to the situation that many were not happy to work in the assigned group.Many conflicts were in the group on what content to put in the poster in the beginning the poster session. There was a conflict on who entrust present the poster on the day of presentation. Everyone wanted to present the poster and everyone wanted every letter of them to be in the poster. This w as not viable because many of the contents were same and some of the data were not in the scope of the assignment. The group members felt that their efforts were neglected.Poor exercise of the group was due toImproper co-ordination of group members.1.4 ANALYSIS OF THE PASTThis situation look oned me of the incident that happened once I was in my under ammonium alum. The people were not happy to work in the group for the research lab project. My team up members went and stood with the friends in other groups. They used to chat and always my group had no resolutenesss in the experiments. Out of 11 experiments in the lab we had result for only 2 experiments. The run-in instructor called each one in the group personally to k without delay the problem. When he knew the problems he took the group to the dinner and helped us to know each other well. I remember he even assigned some nick names appreciating our good characters. We were interpreted for trekking to improve the co-ordin ation. After a month group members felt booming to work in the group and next semester we got 9 results out of 11 experiments in the lab.1.5 ANALYSIS OF THE proficiency USEDThe technique my undergrad turn tail instructor employed was Wheelans Integrated Model of Group Development.Stage 1 dependence and InclusionIn the dinner we exchanged the stories our own self-importance about our families, friends and yesteryear life. The special talents we had like singing and dancing.Stage 2 Counter dependency and FightWe were introduced to topics that ordain cause conflict I remember some topics like Moral dress code make in colleges we had conflicts that went for days.Stage 3 Trusts / bodily structureWe were taken for trekking in engage mountains where we feature to hold each other in order to be safe. We helped each other and frame of reference the trust.Stage 4 Works / productivityWhen we went to work for the group lab project we still had conflicts but we had greater trust and we re testamenting to help each other. That do as slang good results in the lab in the next semester.Stage 5 FinalThis didnt apply to the lab group because we were in the same group till the end of my undergrad.I applied this technique number of times during my undergrad in order to form groups for cultural events in the university.1.6 ANALYSIS OF WHAT WE COULD HAVE make FOR THE STARCH PRESENTATIONA similar arise like this should nominate been followed in the starch poster.Stage 1 Dependency and InclusionWe should brook gone for dinner or indoor games. We should stupefy known the individuals talents and appreciated him. So that he would have felt the importance of him in the group.Stage 2 Counter dependency and FightWe should have conflicted on the topics that like gulf war where everyone can talk and will contribute in a different way.Stage 3 Trusts / StructureWe should have gone for activities and games like trekking in steep mountains where we could have build the trust and resolved our conflicts.Stage 4 Works / Productivity and then we should have worked in the starch poster so that everyone is willing to put the important contents in the poster. They would have taught the importance of group/team beyond their individual works represented in the poster.Stage 5 FinalThis wont apply to the group because we will be in the same group till the end of masters.1.7 ACTION PLANThe activity plan is done for the better performance of the group in February in deciding the project that can be taken for the business plan. trample 1 Many group meetings are done not with motto of assignments but except to know each other better. (Have to be done before December.)Step 2 Many common issues of conflict are discussed about favourite actors and actress. The cultural misconceptions are conflicted. (Have to be done before January.)Step 3 The trust is developed in the individuals by trips to forbidding pool and many places. (Have to be done before January.)Step 4 we hav e done the next presentation better but we have to still build the team because there will be to a greater extent conflicts as only one project have to be selected for the CLS course to make business plan and others should accept it. (Have to be done before January.)1.8 CONCLUSIONBy following this technique I created high performance teams in my undergrad during cultural events. I believe the same vigilance technique will work in the masters level and we will be able to select the project with less conflict. On the course of the analysis of this technique, Wheelans Integrated Model of Group Development we will escort the talents of each member. This will help each member to work in the area in which they have great interest on and which they know better than other group members in the business plan. therefrom the technique Wheelans Integrated Model of Group Development will help us do an excellent business plan for the CLS course.INCIDENT TWO I GOT 54% IN SHAPING IDEAS FOR merch andise ASSIGNMENT.2.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE INCIDENTThis incident happened on 17 December 2010. It was the feedback given for summative course work on the topic BUSINESS REPORT ON GENTRONIX in the course shaping ideas for market.Shaping ideas for market is one of my favourite subjects in my masters course. In this course I had special interest in cultivation number of books as possible. I read books like competitive outline and balanced scorecards which were beyond the reading material list. In the moldable feedback this was reflected as my instructor mentioned your business perplex looks quite good and many things are just right. My reading and knowledge was well reflected in the class room when I answered I was always right and I knew the answer for every question put forward by my instructor. Such reflection in formative feedback and classroom sessions made me feel I will do well in the business report. I did the business report and when I submitted I felt I will get good mar k yet the result was not that I scored 54%.2.2 FEELING OF THE INCIDENT (ON THE SPOT ANALYSIS)What I felt?I just felt the mark was not mine. I read the feedback completely and when the word Getronics came I was sure it was my mark.What did the course instructor feel?The feedback underlined area for low mark.The business template was not used.The referencing was not to the level of masters.Inappropriate usage of analytical tools.But the feedback mentions, A very confusing piece of work difficult after reading the whole assignment the markers could not reckon what Gentronics really does and that makes it impossible to furbish up the analytical techniques used in the report.What my class members felt?When I express my marks many of my class mates felt I was simply lying and I was sarcastic.2.3 EVALUATION OF THE INCIDENTUnderstanding of what an assignment is is derived from the knightly experiences in schools and colleges. The assumption I made in the assignmentThe business model is only a graphical representation of the theory. I could make my own graphical representation of the business model.I have reference only a few articles in my undergrad when an assignment was given. draw out for the literary works review I didnt reference more than 5-6 references.The course instructor would clearly know what Gentronix really does before even reading the report as my undergrad supervisor knew, in and out the topic and checkered whether I did it right.Yet clearly as the feedback mentions all my assumptions were wrong. And my 3rd assumption made my assignment impossible to be even marked. The lesson I have learnt is never change the template, an assignment is just like a literature review and I want to explain things from the scratch the markers dont know lots about the company until I explain it in my report.This lesson was learnt at a great cost i.e. I lost 46% marks. Yet I have an mental testing for the other 50% to get things on track2.4 ANALYSIS OF THE PASTTh is situation remembered me of the incident that happened in my grad 10. It happened in the business mathematics course. I worked out hard for the exam I solved many questions as possible. I got answers for 8 questions out of 10 in exercises. In the main examination I failed to pass. In fact I got only 5 marks out atomic number 6. I remember the reason was I made a mistake in the particular equation that was the first step for every problem in the chapter. My course instructor could not give me marks because it was the first step of every problem in the examination. After I got the feedback I came to know, the mistakes I made was not only in the particular equation but I had mistake in number of equations.This problem was every time I did the sum I had the equation in front of me in the convey room beautifully inscribed in colours. But in the exam hall I had no such equations in front of me and I failed to remember the inscription. The parameters and variables in the external surr ound changed in both of the do the shaping ideas for market and grad 10 examinations. And I failed.In my grad 10 I fought back the problem and I got 95 marks out of 100 in the nett exam. The technique I used was improving my doctrine in the Napoleon Hills pyramid dust mentioned in the famous book Think and Grow Rich2.5 ANALYSIS OF THE TECHNIQUE USEDThe technique revolves around 3 important parameters for success. The 3 vertices of the trigon in the success pyramid desire, doctrine and action.Napoleon Hills pyramid systemActionFaith DesireIn my 10 grad even after I saw 5 marks in the feedback I had a strong desire to score 100/100 in the musical theme in the final exam. The desire is just a indirect request and cant be converted into actions and finishs unless I have organized religion in acquire 100 marks. I had no trustingness in get 100 marks after I got 5marks but I had faith in acquiring 10 marks. I made a goal that I will get 10 marks in the final exam I worked out p roblems and adopted techniques to get 10 marks. In a week I was very sure I will get 10 marks whatever the question newsprint and environment may be. With 100 marks as desire I had now faith to get 15 marks, I made goals and solved problems for getting 15 marks. I continued it till I increased my faith to get 100 marks.When I when for the final exam my parents and course instructor prayed that I should pass the exam. Yet I knew I am passing play to do it great and I did it.2.6 ANALYSIS OF WHAT I COULD HAVE DONE FOR THE BUSINESS REPORTI wish I could have got the assumptions right. Looked at business reports I could have gotWhat is referenced how and how many?How business model template is used?What degree of basic data do the markers need about the company and its products?My next opportunity to employ my understanding would be my business plan.2.7 ANALYSIS OF WHAT CAN BE DONE FOR SHAPING IDEAS FOR MARKET COURSE IN THE EXAMINATIONEvery time, when the mark is low it affects the fait h vertex in Napoleon Hills pyramid. Now I have faith in passing the shaping ideas for market exam with 50% marks. I will employ short goals to improve my mark by 10% every week. Work out different past question paper to find every time and in every paper I am consistently increasing the marks. I will check my bank check by self analysis and discussion with classmates. I will do this until I am sure that I will get 100 marks.Personal SWOT to improve the shaping ideas for market marks distinctivenessI have read Bragg and Bragg the course book.I know what is beingness done in classroom sessions.I have got good formative feedback and I was able to answer questions in the class.WeaknessI have lost 46% marks in the business report.I dont understand where to use the tool and how to use them.OpportunityTo look at past papers.To collect articles to see the usage of tools.TreatsThe pattern of exam and question paper will be new.I am writing an exam in the business course for the first time. Need to spend time for other exams.2.8 ACTION PLANThe 4 week plan to get high marks in shaping ideas for marketWeek 1 alteration course materials be confident to pass the exam.Week 2 jut out the past exam papers demonstrate to answer them within 30 minutes/question. Improve every time in answering the questions in time and content.Week 3Discuss with friend on their views of exams and try to find the methodology adapted is same. Try to find what may be improved and what may be eliminated to score more marks.Week 4Revise the work done for 3 weeks. Analyze all the possible risks. Be prepared a day before for the examination.2.9 CONCLUSIONThis action plan is made combining the SWOT and pyramid approach. The view of getting high marks is writing the exact number of words and training the examiner expects to see in the paper. This information on what examiner great power expect is got by critically analyzing every session of the course which is the first week plan. The second week puts the understanding into action. The third week checks for faults and other class members views of the content presented in class. Week 4 taking product line of what is very important, important and less important. This is a way of managing time where in 1.5 hours the exam is completed writing the very important and important details. Thus in exam I will never miss the very important or important details whatever the factors may be. This strategy is adopted in getting high marks.