Islam and Christianity Essay

Prompt Using the documents, compare and contrast the attitudes of Christianity and Islam toward merchandisers and handle from the religions origins origins until about 1500. are there indications of change over clock time in either case, or both? What kinds of additional documents would you need to assess the consequences of these attitudes on merchant activities? During the Post-Classical date of reference merchants played an incredible role in shaping the course of opposite societies. Christianity in its origins had a controvert view of merchants while Islam was much irresponsible as daten in their religious documents however by 1500 the two religions had switched their views, Christianity more(prenominal)(prenominal) positive and Islam negative as displayed in the opinions of authorities and the action of merchants.Views on richesiness can be seen in the religious documents of each religion. Christianity had its contemporaries in the first nose candy C.E. and had a negative view of merchants and wealth as stated by Jesus (doc 1) However, this source is just superstar statement from the Christian scriptures and additional religious documents would be necessary to rile a complete thorough argument on Christianitys views on wealth and merchants. On the other hand Islam which was born in the seventh century C.E. and was more positive in its treatment of wealth if the merchant was honorable (doc 2). As in the case of Christianity it would be necessary to sustain further passages from the Koran on the issue of wealth and merchants to move over a complete picture of Islams origins view.However with the sources provided it is idle that Christianity has a more negative view on wealth than Islam at their origins. As time progressed in the Post-Classical Era there were major changes in Islam and Christianity as seen in the discussions of Authorities. Islam had expanded across Afro-Asia and had become precise wealthy because of care in Dhar Al-Isla m. On the other hand Christian europium had entered a Dark-Ages of pocket-size trade with the fall of the Roman pudding stone in the West. However, by 1200 C.E. Europe had come out of the Dark-Ages on its way to the Renaissance. Europe was very elicit in wealth and trade. An additional source of trade maps displaying trade wealth in 800 C.E. and 1500 C.E. of Islam and Christianity would help to explain why the views of the religions were changing.This change can be seen in Reginalds writing about St. Godric in the 12th century C.E. Godric is a saint recognized by the church because he helped with his wealthacquired by existence a merchant. Godric used his wealth for good as a provide one could argue that wealth acquired is not horror as long as it used well. It is important to note that Reginald is a colleague of St. Godric and he could be biased causing Godric to look pause than he really was. This could change the use of this document because the information whitethorn not be completely valid (doc 3).Showing the change in Christianity is Aquinas argument in the 13th century C.E. He argues against being dishonest in trade and wealth. He does not condemn wealth and trade just negative ways to conduct trade (doc 4). This brings Christianity very close to Muhammads statements in the Koran. Islam on the hand was more negative in its view of merchants. Ibn Khaldun argues that no merchant can be a true honest man. Yet he still has to concede that trade is necessary (doc 5).This source could be biased because it occurred after the fall of the Abassid Empire and the problems with wealth and opulence that had plagued the Muslim world moreover he could be an Ulama and had a strict view of Islam. As a result it could not portray what other scholars believed a t the time. This negative Islamic view can also be seen in the court conclusion of the 17th century C.E. in the verdict is against a merchant (doc 7). It is make headway that Islam is closer to Christiani ties original views on Merchants and Christianity is becoming more positive.The views of Merchants provides a clear change. In the 13th century C.E. Christian merchants are engaged in using religious terms promoting trade. Even a mother of a rich merchant advises him to be thankful but not overly greedy. Again this is very close to Islams original position on the issue. This document could be biased because it is merchants writing and the words of a mother. incomplete of these people would be negative on themselves or loved ones. As a result this could exaggerate the practice of Christian in merchants and trade (doc 6). An additional source of different merchants writings would be good to see if all merchants used Christianity to sanction their actions. Moreover it would be good to shoot other Islamic merchants in writings than just document 7. This would give a better view of Islamic merchant actions around 1500 C.E.By 1500 C.E. it is clear that Christianity had become more in-li ne to Islams original views on merchants and Islam was more in-line to Christianitys origins.