A New Nation of Individuals :: Literature Papers

A innovative Nation of IndividualsAbstractAs prat furious articulates, Nothing costs adequate here, in Huxleys chivalrous sore World (1932) of bottled automata, where maelstroms of soma-ingesting, Malthusian orgies casu eachy toss human disembodied spirit nigh (239). Nothing is dear when the liberty to choose disappears because individuals dont k nowadays what its like being anything else (74). Removing choice is simply a order of brainwashing that all subdues human nature for the short-run. Consider Sigmund Freuds views of confidential berth In abolishing hidden property we deprive the human delight of aggression, sure enough a strong one, though certainly not the strongest tho we befool in no way altered the differences in advocator and becharm which are misused by aggressiveness, nor have we altered anything in its nature. aggressiveness was not created by property. (Kumar 384) Aggressiveness, too, was not created by choice. This essay proposes a utopia establish on individual freedom, derived from a laissez-faire economy and semi-socialist meritocracy. A New Nation of IndividualsFirst existed the individual then a company of individuals open government via a social contract. Thus, as Percy Bysshe Shelley writes, (g)overnment has no rights it is a commissioning from several individuals for the purpose of securing their own. It is therefore just, only so farther as it exists by their consent, useful only so far as it operates to their well-being (qtd. in Chianese 282). Such basic democracy founded the United States of the States however modern democracy has gone terribly awry, and power now lies in the hands of few rather than many. Ideally, (t)he highest purpose of Nature, which is the development of all the capacities which stick out be achieved by mankind, is attainable only in society, and more(prenominal) specifically in the society with the greatest freedom, and the greatest freedom arsehole only be obtained, as T horeau believed, by a government that governs least (202). In order for the individual to maintain full rights and a wholly separate, private sphere of self, government must be just monstrous enough to protect mans unalienable rights, Thomas Jeffersons life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, merely not overstep its boundaries onto the slippery slope of tyranny or oppression. A Utopian society should thus stem from a meritocracy that allows for maximum identity element and freedom of choice while protecting man from one another, specifically through universal education and healthcare, and a laissez-faire economy founded on a flat-rate sales tax.A New Nation of Individuals Literature written documentA New Nation of IndividualsAbstractAs John Savage articulates, Nothing costs enough here, in Huxleys Brave New World (1932) of bottled automata, where maelstroms of soma-ingesting, Malthusian orgies casually toss human life about (239). Nothing is dear when the freedom to choos e disappears because individuals dont see what its like being anything else (74). Removing choice is simply a method of brainwashing that only subdues human nature for the short-run. Consider Sigmund Freuds views of private property In abolishing private property we deprive the human love of aggression, certainly a strong one, though certainly not the strongest but we have in no way altered the differences in power and influence which are misused by aggressiveness, nor have we altered anything in its nature. Aggressiveness was not created by property. (Kumar 384) Aggressiveness, too, was not created by choice. This essay proposes a utopia based on individual freedom, derived from a laissez-faire economy and semi-socialist meritocracy. A New Nation of IndividualsFirst existed the individual then a group of individuals established government via a social contract. Thus, as Percy Bysshe Shelley writes, (g)overnment has no rights it is a delegation from several individuals for t he purpose of securing their own. It is therefore just, only so far as it exists by their consent, useful only so far as it operates to their well-being (qtd. in Chianese 282). Such basic democracy founded the United States of Americayet modern democracy has gone terribly awry, and power now lies in the hands of few rather than many. Ideally, (t)he highest purpose of Nature, which is the development of all the capacities which can be achieved by mankind, is attainable only in society, and more specifically in the society with the greatest freedom, and the greatest freedom can only be obtained, as Thoreau believed, through a government that governs least (202). In order for the individual to maintain full rights and a completely separate, private sphere of self, government must be just large enough to protect mans unalienable rights, Thomas Jeffersons life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but not overstep its boundaries onto the slippery slope of tyranny or oppression. A utopi an society should thus stem from a meritocracy that allows for maximum individuality and freedom of choice while protecting man from one another, specifically through universal education and healthcare, and a laissez-faire economy founded on a flat-rate sales tax.