Opposing views in the play Essay

sacerdotal was a sociableist, he thought that the divide between rich and wretched was a problem. priestly similarly helped set up a semipolitical party which he believed would give people a fairer system. His work and ideas helped to pass on changes such as the welf atomic number 18 state. He wrote the wanton in consecrate to put across his views. We dont live al atomic number 53. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. This shows Priestleys socialism through the purpose of the inspector. It shows that we should think nigh how we behave around other people and how we are whole equal. The sportswomanact was set in 1912 and written in 1945. This was to remind the audience of how it was before the war. Also it was set in 1912 so hieratic could incorporate melodramatic jeering.In the opening of the scarper Priestly uses dramatic devices to draw in the audience. The Play is setIn the dining fashion where it is heavily comfor panel but non cosy and home same(p). This creates an theory that though the family are wealthy, successful, and of the upper class, there is lack of family warmth. This reveals that the pillow slips in the birl family are deprived of familial warmth and affection.I think Priestly gives such a detailed description of the stage set because, he wants to accurately glow a specific period in time, and as well as as the setting doesnt change through out the play its best to get it right the first time.In the opening of the play priestly includes specific props to give a sense of social class in the birls. At the very(prenominal) beggary Edna is clearing the table of dessert plates and champagne glasses, replacing them with a decanter of port, cigar boxes and cigarettes. These objects are all expensive things, things you would expect to find at a supernumerary occasion. Therefore, not only does it show the Birlings upper class, it also shows that there is a special occasion.The characters costumes a re roughly described to match the correct period of time. custody more-so, partly because they would all have been the same, and partly because this would be a fixed dress code for a special occasion in those days. This would evidence the audience immediately what period the play was set in.At the begging of the play the lighting is a soft pink, this is to show how relaxed the Birlings were and that everything was ok. Like the cheek looking back through rose coloured spectacles. Then as the inspector arrives there is a dramatic change of lighting to a hard, brighter light to show the inspectors sternness.At the beginning of the play the characters are each described briefly of their characteristics and emotions. These descriptions shall change through the play for at the beginning they are clearly happy in solemnization and through out the rest of the play become more worried, upset, or argumentative. The inspector is described as An impression of massiveness, solidity and pur posefulness, he grows and remains more solid when each of the other characters error down. This is because Priestly wants to put across that the inspector (a socialist) is superior to the Birlings. The Inspector goes about his investigation in chronological order to the happenings of Eva Smith, slowly breakout down each character letting them foresee their mistakes.Birlings speeches are really important as Priestly uses dramatic irony to put across his ideas about social status. In his speeches Birling sounds irresponsible and pompous, thinking he knows it all when dramatic irony shows how wrong he is. Titanic-she sails next week-forty six thousand eight hundred tons-New York in louvre days-and every luxury-and unsinkable. The audience all know the Titanic was infact not unsinkable and that it sank a week later, making Birling sound overly confident, bordering on pompous in his vision of the future. He is thus creating in Birling an untrustworthy character-if he is wrong about t his he might also be wrong in other things he says.Birling is visualised as a typical business man, an individualist, and a capitalist and his attitudes reflect that. For example he makes a speech to his intelligence and future son in law which is interrupted by the inspector. He repeats the idea that a man has to make his own way, has to look after himself which seems to embody his individual philosophy. It seems that Priestly uses speeches as an important device to highlight the opposing views in the play.The inspectors final speech would almost parody this precedent speech in that he proposes the exact opposite view We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other Priestly uses the character of the inspector as a mouth-piece to say his socialist views.An inspector calls is very much a play to put across Priestlys veiws about things he believed in, e.g socialism. An enjoyable mystery performance for people who like a twist.