Sunday, January 13, 2019
Friendship Between George and Lennie Essay
In the novel Of Mice and Men Steinbeck stresses the grandeur and abnormality of the companionship between George and Lennie by exploitation a variety of systems. They be complete opposites, yet they share a journey through the struggles of The Great drop-off as friends and have faith in the homogeneous dream. This pulls them together through the intimately stressful parts of the novel. These two gipsy workers meet many race along their journey, just now the bond between them doesnt weaken. Right from the beginning of the novel, Steinbeck has outli motive the relationship between Lennie and George appears abnormal. Steinbeck uses dialogue as a method acting to show the father and news roles between Lennie and George, Look, George, look what I make. This suggests that Steinbeck urgencys to show Lennie as having the mind of a little boy when he says this, you infer of when a son would say this to a father figure in this graphic symbol George in order to get about kind of reaction.It is as if Lennie is trying to print George. This is quite grotesque, between grown manpower of around the very(prenominal) age remember that Lennie is a fully grown man, but has the mind of a five form old. The author uses historical context as a method and 3rd psyche narration to allow new(prenominal) peoples views about George and Lennie to be expressed, I never seen one guy interest so much trouble for other guy. This implies, that even form one of the initiative characters that George and Lennie come across, we al organise get the judgment that others signify that Lennie and George have a uncanny experience and an unlikely bond. A atomic pile of the characters have a tone do to sound suspicious, which I entail is designedly written in to the novel be magic Steinbeck. People found it queer because at the time of the Great Depression, no one had friends because everyone was in competition for the same jobs. The other characters noticed this and thought that it was strange. stool Steinbeck uses description as a method to emphasise the unusual nature of the friendship between George and Lennie, Behind him walked hi opposite, a huge man, shapeless of face, with large, pale heart and soulThis suggests that these two men completely note each other in looks, as puff up as state of mind. This makes you ask why George attachs around Lennie, if he is harmonise to the book, a handsome, smart man. They are opposites in everything, but love each other like brothers. George is very fit, healthy and ready to brace anything thrown at him, whereas Lennie is depict as much more careless(p) and in a world of his own. This shows contrast personalities. From the start of the novel, Lennie is shown to be very childlike. John Steinbeck used metaphors as a method to show this, dabbed his big paw. A big paw is suggesting that Lennie has animalistic qualities, whether that is looks or behaviour I think it is both. Because of these anima listic qualities, I think that Lennie is immature and rugged to handle.This makes the friendship between Lennie and George wait strange because I think to myself why would George want to stay around Lennie? Even though Lennie could wind George up and test his patience, they stick by each other. Throughout the novel, Steinbeck uses betoken as a method to portray how weird Lennie and Georges friendship is, He aint no good to you, glass. Earlier in the story, Candys old dog was blastoff dead by Carlson, because they decided that he was of no use to anyone anymore. Candy consequently told George that it would be more comforting to put up that he shot the dg himself. At the end of the novel, George shot Lennie and he pulled the institution because he knew that Lennie didnt need to live anymore and would be better in heaven. George killed Lennie himself because he remembered what Candy told him about the dog. This is a perfect example of the author using correlation. Also, at the start of the novel, they were on the line and if George hadnt shot Lennie, they would have to place again.This shows a cyclical occurrence. Steinbecks theme about this friendship makes me realise that it would be extremely unusual to form a friendship during the Great Depression payable to everyone fighting for jobs at the same ranches. However, Lennie and George did not compete, they stuck together and found jobs at the same ranch. Lennie treats George like a father and George inevitably Lennie as a companion. I think this is why they work so well together it is because they need each other. Their friendship reaches its ultimate test, when George has to choose whether or not to shoot Lennie, as self-sacrifice. However, everything that George does for Lennie is in Lennies best interest. John Steinbeck makes the friendship seem unusual, but deep down, I think that it is really just natural for them to need a companion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.