A Bill for the Minorities

Racial unlikeness had been the subject of debate in the congress for a long time. practic each(prenominal)y times, members of the congress question the extent of efficiency of execution of the rectitude regarding racial favoritism among the citizens of the United States. The minorities (specifically the blacks) were to a greater extent likely to be iso latishd from the indigene whites.The minorities had been just aboutwhat deprived of certain rights which the whites chiefly enjoy. However, this disparity set mingled with the minorities and the whites had been resolved through the civil Rights subroutine of 1964 originally proposed by the late President John F.Kennedy.The bill was not officially pursued by the mentioned President because of his assassination. His Vice President, Lyndon Johnson who took his spatial relation as president, then signed the righteousness (Civil Rights Act of 1964) on July 2, 1964. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 favored most minorities thus givin g them equal opportunity in terms of job, educational activity and separate go as that of the whites. As stated in the opening dissever of the bill, it is an ActTo enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the rule courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in open accommodations, to assoil the attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to ext overthrow the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes ( patronage VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 1997). The faithfulness protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of race and color as well as national origin, sex, or religion (Facts about ply/Color Discrimination, 2002). Rise of the Minorities Equal imposition of rights on employment, education, v oting, and other services provided by the State brought the minorities to a rise. The provision of the 1964 Act brings forth the protective covering of several classes including race, color, sex, creed, and age (The National Archives, archives.gov). President Kennedys aim to end discrimination among the quite a little living in the state causes a sprain condition. In order to go behind with the rules set by the law, some institutions ar making policies which argon basically incline to favor minorities more than the white Ameri potfuls. This scenario can be reflected in c adenosine monophosphateus premises. Granting of scholarships to students on the basis of financial needs encouraged the diversity of minorities in the school premises to development (Education, 1990).In addition, since most families belonging to the minority groups received minimal amount of income, the scholarships provided depart be in no doubt be apt(p) to their children. entitle IV of the 1964 Civil Righ ts Act deals about the desegration of public education which states that sight concerning the lack of availability of equal educational opportunities for individuals by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin in public educational institutions at all levels in the United States must be thoroughly conducted and reported (Civil rights Act 1964). Institutions granting scholarships seem to misapprehend the statement mentioned above. Equal educational opportunities should be disposed(p) fairly to all individuals not only to few issues of people thus having this basis is considered as illegal and clearly violates the law. Furthermore, it can be clearly reflected that minorities were the most favored in this scenario. The scenario in the learning place proves that the civil rights act of 1964 was indeed the most far-reaching and effective piece of command regarding minorities in American history.In an article cited in the 1964 Civil Rights Act to the Present, it is give ton gue to that integration of southern districts was progressing, black college students were enrolling in previously white colleges are at a greater rate. Thus, such integration provided both the minorities and the whites to take over equal access to sophisticated facilities and obtain same degree of education. Minorities in like manner benefited in terms of employment upon the approval of the bill. Discrimination in hiring strength for a job was completely eliminated.The law oral communicationes employers to set aside factors including race, gender, sex, etc in hiring, promotion as well as termination of individuals in the job. as yet in the political arena, the minorities had gained their right to be pick out. Some of the African Americans who were elected as public officers were Edward Brooke, Carl Stokes, Douglas Wilder and Gen. Colin Powell (The 1964 Civil Rights Act to the Present). Conclusion Truly, the Civil Rights Act pioneered by the late President John F. Kennedy mar ks a change in the American society.Most of the minorities at present times are enjoying privileges which they were deprived before. The integration betwixt the whites and the minorities resulted in the success of a number of blacks in the facets of business, education, government and other fields. The affirmative action taken into identify by policy makers put an end on the severe discrimination experienced by the minorities. However, this change in the American society also opens the idea of reverse discrimination between the whites and the non-whites.The imposition of the equal rights between the two classes had advance the liberty of the minorities but in contrary contravene the liberty of the whites. Racial discrimination must be looked at in both ways. It is unjust to only consider the minorities as the victims of discrimination and is be deprive of certain rights. As for what is happening at present times, it can be reflected that the aim of the proponents of the bill to end discrimination was somehow ineffective.The law seems to focus its eyes to the protection of the minorities while concerns regarding the whites had been somewhat taken for granted thus, equality between the two classes should be fairly treated and address in the congress. Work Cited EEOC, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1997, January 15). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Retrieved whitethorn 26, 2008, from http//www. eeoc. gov/policy/vii. html. The National Archives, archives. gov. doctrine with Documents The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http//www. archives. gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act/. Historical documents. com. Civil Rights Act (1964). Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http//www. historicaldocuments. com/CivilRightsAct1964. htm. The 1964 Civil Rights Act to the Present. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http//www. infoplease. com/ce6/history/A0858852. html. The New York Times. (2 008, May 25) Education. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http//query. nytimes. com/gst/fullpage. html? res=9C0CE7D8133FF930A25751C1A966958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all. .