Reaction Essay To An Editorial

Student NameTeacher NameClass TitleJanuary 14 , 2007Lieberman for `Peanut Butter SocialismA recent editorial in the sore York Times has taken a manifestation at the state of American anti-terrorism patronage the editor concludes that the ideals of modern York mayor Michael Bloomberg concerning favoritism of funding are further shimmer to those of incoming Senator in charge , Joseph Lieberman While Bloomberg has stated his feeling opinion that cities manage New York are at furthermost greater risk of terrorism and therefore need more(prenominal) than currency than other separate of the country , Lieberman has retained his more collectivistic belief (he is not affiliated with any troupe and gained his go d cause as an Independent ) that national funding moldiness be allocated withally to all percentages and ur ban areas of the tucker out together States . The editorial (cited on a lower floor ) has sided with mayor Bloomberg , and the editor refers to Lieberman s funding plans as the ` wild attic butter effect evenly spread across the nationWho is even in this situation ? It is a difficult and certainly debatable question , however like most situations under tight scrutiny it becomes evident that both workforce are signal valid points Bloomberg is understandably concerned about the cling toion of his chief city which is undeniably under more threat than other split of the country from terrorism the attacks on the World Trade redneck in New York City were indeed the first terrorist act that brought attention to the funding in the first place .

To the city manager , it only makes sense to fortify such areas of the United States as are obvious tar seizes for terrorists and make bust use of the national funding by doing soConversely , Lieberman feels that it is both the remediate of every urban center in America to chip in access to funding to protect itself and also the responsibility of the federal government to provide the heart to do so found on his blanket plot of fund allocation , the money available to major cities like New York is brought down drastically this is the major concern of the Mayor and his supporters . While this aspect of Lieberman s tinct social plan is put one across to him as well as his detractors the Senator s decision has been based on his organic belief that each and every city or region of the country deserves the money to protect itself from terrorismUndeniably , both men hurl raised important issues of both social substructure pay offs and risks congenital in particular areas of the country . If these ideals were merged together , peradventure it might be possible for cities to all have the right to claim this funding , however for each of them to run their own risk assessment and decide for themselves whether or not it is undeniable . Certainly , New York would claim its share of the funding delinquent to obvious reasons a small city far upcountry and without national monuments , federal buildings and international attention may identify far fewer risks and therefore claim each no funding or a small measuring puzzle to fortify one or two particular...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper